Differing Opinions Come to The Front Following Tesla’s Bitcoin Dump-Off

Avatar photo
Ad disclosure WeInvests is an independent platform with the mission of simplifying financial decisions. Therefore, we work with independent professionals to offer you the latest news. We may receive compensation if you click on certain links, sponsored posts, products and/or services, transferring leads to brokers, or advertisements. We do our utmost best to ensure you will not incur any disadvantages as a user. No rights can be derived from the Content we provided on or through our website, nor should this be considered as legal, tax, investment, financial or other advice. The Content is for informational purposes only. In case of any doubt, you should seek advice from an independent financial advisor. Read More >>

Tesla (TSLA) decided to sell upwards of $936 million in Bitcoin (BTC) throughout the second quarter, despite a general downturn in the cryptocurrency market and a diminishing financial environment. The retail cryptocurrency community reacted positively to the trade. However, infrastructural cryptocurrency traders have been less optimistic.

During the corporation’s earnings report, Tesla CEO Elon Musk noted that the company wished to enhance its equity position in the face of the COVID-19 shutdowns in China. Tesla made a $64 million profit on the deal.

The move elicited mixed reactions from institutional virtual currency traders. Some argued that it was expected given Tesla’s commercial interests, while others argued that the move could impact market players.

The Tesla headlines are a bearish news story, but it is not entirely unexpected, according to Katie Talati, head of research at Arca. As per its disclosures, Tesla sold their BTC assets for around $29K in the last quarter to generate positive operating cash flow. Tesla would have experienced negative free cash flow performance if not for this.

Talati stated that the headlines had nothing to do with Bitcoin’s foundational dissertation but rather with Tesla’s financial strategic plan during a market downturn.

In the long run, this shouldn’t make a difference because the progress of BTC varies depending on widespread adoption by corporations, persons, and authorities, not just one.

Vadym Synegin, VP of Web3 ecosystem WeWay, disagreed. Tesla’s original intention was to hold the renowned cryptocurrency for the long haul, he told interviewers. Bitcoin, the most valuable virtual currency by market capitalization, was used as a compromise because the corporation needed to improve its cash performance and profitability during one of its most challenging periods.

Tesla has stated that it is willing to buy more Bitcoin in the coming years, but interested parties may be wary of the idea given the firm’s volatility, according to Synegin. It has a significant impact on the industry.

While every company has its own business strategy, the Tesla trading may cause some to re-evaluate their perspectives in the short and long term, he says.

Anton Gulin, the company head at AAX Exchange, agreed. Although the sales were made purely for managing risk and to implore shareholders before revealing company earnings, he claims that financial institutions take such behavior seriously.

Gulin told interviewers that from an ethical perspective, Musk’s comments and actions have already become a punchline in their own right and therefore are difficult to take seriously. This is just another illustration and signifier of why you should perceive with your noggin rather than your heart.

He stated that it is evident that the macro as well as microeconomic variables are complex and that having money on hand is beneficial. It is also hard to overlook that the industry is becoming more solvent and that the sell-off has not destroyed it. The industry has progressed.

How Large Has the Impact Been? 

Other traders believe the Bitcoin economy is much larger than any prominent contributor.

If Tesla had decided to sell its Bitcoin in Q2 2021, the influence on the cryptocurrency space would have been much larger, according to Mikkel Morch, an executive at the cryptocurrency hedge fund ARK36.

From a narrative standpoint, Tesla’s purchase of the largest crypto asset last year provided a much-needed increase. It was perceived as an acknowledgment of Bitcoin as a high-quality institutional investment. The circumstances have changed since then. Bitcoin is now a worldwide macro resource, driven by forces far larger than Musk, he claims.

Although the value of Bitcoin fell as a result of the media coverage, a healthy market correction was anticipated after seven days of improvements, according to Morch.

Meanwhile, Tesla’s participation in the cryptocurrency market continues. During the earnings call, Musk noted that the organization was welcoming to increasing its Bitcoin prominence in the future, and the company has retained its Dogecoin (DOGE) assets.

The Bottom Line

It seems that Musk deciding to sell Tesla’s Bitcoin holdings has coincided with the expected market correction relating to the coin. This actually backs up claims from some experts who believe that it may finally be time for a return to form for the world’s most renowned crypto asset.

Risk Disclaimer

WeInvests is a financial portal-based research agency. We do our utmost best to offer reliable and unbiased information about crypto, finance, trading and stocks. However, we do not offer financial advice and users should always carry out their own research.

Read More
Previous Post

Is Cryptocurrency on The Come-Up?

Next Post

More Than Three-Quarters of Retail Stores Intend on Accepting Crypto Within Two Years

Related Posts